Monday, October 28, 2013

SNAP

The Power of Love and Honesty

“Odd, because as a family they never discussed their faith on a personal level that involved doubt in any way.” ~SNAP

Mick Mooney spins an emotional tale of a Christian family that is in a state of dysfunction primarily caused by the powers of the institutional church. These powers, of course are the showmanship of Hollywood, the manipulative techniques of Madison Avenue, mixed with the deadly, cut-throat politics of governments everywhere.

However, this is brought to us “up-front and personal” as we enter the lives of Senior Pastor Richard and his family and his brother Ted.  Even though this is a relatively brief book, it draws the reader in very quickly and it is difficult to put down until the end…and then there is the disappointment that there are no more pages! Fortunately, this is the first in a series of four books centered on the same family and characters.

I refuse to give any hint of spoilers here, (you can read the publisher's plot sketch below) but I must say that this book spoke to my heart in a number of ways. Maybe it is because I can personally relate to the destructive forces of  “organized Christianity”

Lest I give the impression that this  book is just full of negatives and criticisms, the primary, and overwhelming emphasis is the preeminence and power of love, and the beauty and peace of life that is available in Jesus for all of us.  And that is where this story moved my heart at a pretty deep level. I put the book down after the last page, encouraged to live a life of pure love for everyone and everything in my life and to embrace the spiritual union that is mystically present in the person of Jesus.

I can only encourage others, as I have already done, to get this book and read it for themselves…there will be no disappointment!

Publisher's Description
Pastor Richard has everything: Perfect house. Perfect car. Perfect appearance. Perfect wife. As the Senior Pastor of Faith First Church, perfection was expected of him, but when his son, Frank, informs him that he no longer wants to be part of Christianity, the cracks begin to show.

Richard's older brother, Ted, who was also once the Senior Pastor of Faith First before his abrupt resignation a decade ago, has been talking with Frank about living a life of faith outside of organized religion for some time. At first Richard doesn't think this is of any serious consequence. However, when Frank is mysteriously scheduled to preach one Sunday evening, his message challenges Richard's church-growth vision so directly it has the potential to blow his perfect facade sky high.

With Henry, the ambitious Associate Pastor, now determined to take matters into his own hands, Richard suddenly has everyone against him: His brother, his son, his wife, his Associate Pastor, and the elders. Despite the pressure, Richard is determined to overcome and maintain his perfect appearance—but everyone has a breaking point, even the Mighty Pastor Richard.

Sunday, July 21, 2013

What on Earth is Trinitarian Theology?

From time to time I run across articles or blog posts that describe things more comprehensively or in better words than I could do...that is okay. We all have our particular abilities and limitations and styles of writing. So, I find it a good way to communicate things I feel, while agreeing, and giving credit to others. What follows is a blog post/article by John Crowder that pretty much summarizes where I am in my walk with God and my understanding of the Christian/Spiritual life. I also include the link to the original blog post here:
http://www.thenewmystics.com/Articles/1000129600/Home_Page_of/Articles/What_on_Earth.aspx

What on Earth is Trinitarian Theology?
by John Crowder

Because of our scriptural belief that Christ represented all mankind in His vicarious death on the cross, some often confuse this gospel truth with the concept of Universalism. Yes, indeed the cross has universal ramifications. But unfortunately many get mixed up because they are unfamiliar with the grace-based stream of Trinitarian theology. Some of my favorite Trinitarian writers are C.S. Lewis, Fr. Robert Capon, C. Baxter Kruger and perhaps the most prominent theologian of the 20th century, Karl Barth. I am not one who enjoys labels or being pigeonholed by them – but the term “Trinitarianism” is very loosely knit across many denominational lines. In fact, it is a way of approaching scripture that I find very exhilarating. For those frustrated with the dogmatic, unsatisfying claims of the rigid Calvinism-Arminian-Universalism debate, I think you’ll find a refreshing world of truth as you discover there are other options to the theological puzzles on the table.

Why Theology?
Theology, for starters, is “God knowledge.” For some reason in our charismatic circles, theology gets downplayed – or at least pitted against personal devotion as if it should be frowned upon. Everyone has a theology. Theology is not a problem ... it’s bad theology that’s problematic. Good theology always enhances your joy, fuels the party and guards you against religion, legalism, condemnation and self-destruction! Ultimately, your theology consists of whatever you believe to be true about God. Good theology is never boring ... nor is it a waste of time. Barth said, “Theology is a peculiarly beautiful discipline.  Indeed, we can confidently say that it is the most beautiful of all disciplines. To find academic study distasteful is the mark of the Philistine.  It is an extreme form of Philistinism to find, or to be able to find, theology distasteful. The theologian who labors without joy is not a theologian at all.  Sulky faces, morose thoughts and boring ways of speaking are intolerable in this field.”

Did you know that theology is actually a form of repentance? Repentance, or metanoia, means to “change your mind.” As we change our mind about the things of God – renewing our thoughts about His goodness and character – His beauty continually manifests in our daily lives.

One common argument is that theology only benefits the mind, whereas God is interested in the heart. I do understand the perils of intellectualism over devotion. But more often than not, we are drawing a false dichotomy between so-called “head faith” and “heart faith.” In fact, the same Greek words for heart and mind are consistently interchangeable!                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

“I believe that many who find that ‘nothing happens’ when they sit down, or kneel down, to a book of devotion, would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand,” writes C.S. Lewis (Introduction to On the Incarnation by Athanasius).

Also, keep in mind that theology is a different discipline than Biblical studies. In Biblical studies, you are working through individual passages. Theology, on the other hand, steps back and looks at the whole counsel of scripture – it is concerned with how we approach the whole thing, rightly dividing its entirety from beginning to end so that we can delve comprehensively into the nature and person of God.

Why Trinitarianism?
Okay, let’s get one thing straight ... Trinitarianism is not about simply believing in the doctrine of the Trinity! It’s a recognition that the Triune God of the Bible is at the heart of all other doctrines and scripture. It means there is a loving Father fully revealed in His Son and made known to us by a very real and present Holy Spirit.

Trinitarianism is not really concerned with the “how” or “why” of individual doctrines as much as the “Who.” Get the person and nature of God, and everything else falls into place. Also, to be faithful to the Trinity, we must be Christocentric. We need look no further outside the person of Jesus Christ in order to see who God is – Father, Son and Spirit. The entire Godhead chose to represent Itself through Jesus – to show how passionate God is for us!

Briefly, let me explain three of my own personal reasons for enjoying the Trinitarian approach to theology:

1- Christ as the Ultimate Text
Everyone says, “I only believe what the Bible says!” What they really mean is that they only believe their own interpretation of the Bible – often very zealously. Yes, the Bible is fully inspired and it’s the means by which we see Jesus ... but Jesus Christ – not the Bible - is the ultimate Word of God.

First and foremost, Trinitarian theology is Christ-centered. Every scripture must be read through the lens of the person of Jesus.  He said, “You diligently study the Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life. These are the Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refuse to come to me to have life” (John 5:39-40). Christ is the ultimate text. The full and final revelation of Who God is. Only by looking at Him can we see the true nature of the Godhead. The Father chose to make Himself known through the Son, and the Spirit constantly points us to Him.

So, in other words, when I read Leviticus, I don’t see a big legalistic finger pointing at me, condemning me for my failure at upholding the law. Instead, I see every scripture pointing its finger at Jesus Christ and His finished work. He is the lens through which I read every other text.

Centering everything on Christ changes all our other doctrines. Consider the doctrine of predestination for instance. It’s not about God choosing some people and rejecting others. Christ is both the Elector and the Elected. Jesus is God’s predestined choice for all of mankind.

Filtering our view of God solely through the revealed Son also means that there is not some other angry God hiding behind Jesus’ back, ready to hit me with a lightening bolt. No dark, impersonal force who stops short of destroying me only because “He remembers the blood.” Jesus and the Father were not playing “good cop/bad cop” on the cross. Jesus was not twisting God’s arm on the cross, persuading the Father not to destroy you! He was not conditioning or changing God so that He would be gracious to you. The Father was always for you! The heart of the entire Trinity is seen in the work of Christ on the cross. When you look at the love of Jesus dying for you, you are seeing the full expression of the love of the Father as well. Jesus was not changing God’s mind about you. God did not need changing – you did! There’s no hidden, dark side of God that Jesus was protecting you from. Not some evil “Old Testament” God that needed to be coaxed into loving us.

When Christ is our ultimate lens for understanding scripture, He is also our lens for seeing the unconditional love of the Godhead.

2 – God is Love
Jesus introduces us to the Father. We hear in His words and actions that our Father loves us unconditionally. He did not send Jesus out of anger to punish someone, but rather out of His infinite love and rock-solid commitment to redeem mankind. The Trinitarian approach does not portray a God who loves on some days and hates on other days. God does not love. God is Love. Even the wrath of God is simply an extension of His love. It is a big, fat “No!” to sinfulness, because of how it destroys and molests His children. God’s wrath has nothing to do with hating us. It has to do with hating the sinfulness that was destroying us. Even God’s wrath is for you, not against you. The Trinitarian approach sees all scripture through the ultimate grid of God’s love.

The Trinitarian approach does not see a moody Father who was personally offended by our sin, requiring the death of His Son to appease His own bloodlust. In fact, the Father never forsook His son on the cross to “satisfy” His anger. Instead, the Father and Spirit were fully involved on the tree, as “God was in Christ, reconciling the cosmos to Himself” (2 Cor. 5:19). Yes, Jesus entered into our own “feeling” of separation from God – our own psychological calamity to experience what it’s like to feel the consequences of sin. On the cross, He asked the questions you ask ... “Why have you forsaken me?” ... But although he asked your human questions, the Father never did forsake the Son. And the Son never doubted the Father. The Father forsakes no one. The scriptures are clear that the Trinity never turned upon itself on the cross. Jesus and the Father are inseparable, “I and my Father are one” (John 10:30). And even when He went to the cross, Jesus said, “You [disciples] will leave me all alone. Yet I am not alone, for my Father is with me” (John 16:32). To see Jesus on the cross is to see the full loving expression of the Godhead.

Even the most difficult texts about wrath and judgment must ultimately be seen through the lens of “God is Love” – there is a silver lining of grace behind it all. He is not a schizophrenic deity bouncing between love and hatred. The point of the cross was to redeem mankind from his own self-destruction ... not to pay off an ill-tempered, narcissistic God who was spitting mad at you for sinning against Him.

CoverVol53 – Dialectical Tension
Many theologies engage in analytical debate against one another with the aim of “winning” when scriptures seem to present contradictions. Trinitarianism is more mystical – perhaps postmodern in that sense. Rather than debate, it lives in the dialectical tension of mystery. It is okay with embracing paradox.

For instance, there are a plethora of verses on hell and eternal torment. But there are also a plethora of verses on universal salvation for all mankind. Which of these verses do you throw away? Be careful taking scissors to your Bible in any direction! Rather than drawing hard lines of debate, Trinitarian theology holds these things in the tension of paradox, keeping hope for mankind without jumping into dogmatic assumptions. We must look at all sides of scripture to arrive at honest answers. But there are places where your logic (even your best theo-logic) will not provide answers.

In addition, the Trinitarian approach is not “causal” or problem oriented. It does not start with problems like “Why aren’t some saved?” Instead, it begins with the person and work of Christ, which was sufficient for all men, and works from there as a starting point.

Please enjoy the next extensive article below which is excerpted from the helpful resources of Grace Communion International – it further expands on Trinitarian theology as well as the person and work of Christ. ...


If you enjoyed this article, we suggest you subscribe to The Ecstatic Magazine with a donation of your choosing!
----------------------------------------
A Brief Introduction to Trinitarian Theology
from Grace Communion International

Historically, Trinitarian theology formed the basis of Christian teaching. This is reflected in the early Christian creeds. Early prominent Trinitarian teachers and theologians included Irenaeus, Athanasius and Gregory of Nazianzus.

Irenaeus (died A.D. 202) was a disciple of Polycarp (who had studied with the apostle John). Irenaeus sought to show that the gospel of salvation taught by the apostles and handed down from them is centered on Jesus. He saw that the Bible presents the Incarnation as a new point of beginning for humanity (see Ephesians 1:9-10, 20-23). Through the Incarnation, the entire human race was “born again” in Jesus. In Jesus, humanity has a new beginning and a new identity.

The biblical foundation of Irenaeus’ thinking included Paul’s statements in Romans 5, where Jesus is presented to us as the “second” (or “final”) Adam of the human race. “In Jesus,” wrote Irenaeus, “God recapitulated in Himself the ancient formation of man [Adam], that He might kill sin, deprive death of its power, and vivify man...” (Against Heresies, III.18.7).

Irenaeus understood that Jesus took all humanity into Himself and renewed the human race through his vicarious (representative and substitutionary) life, death, resurrection and ascension.

Irenaeus taught that this renewing, or re-creating, of the human race in Jesus through the Incarnation is not merely a work done “by” Jesus. Rather, our salvation involves much more than just the forgiveness of our sins. It means our entire re-creation “in” and “through” Jesus.

Athanasius (died A.D. 373) defended the gospel against false teachers (including Arius) who denied the Son’s eternal divinity. This defense led to the formulation of the doctrine of the Trinity affirmed at the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325. In his treatise On the Incarnation, section 20, Athanasius wrote the following:

Thus, taking a body like our own, because all our bodies were liable to the corruption of death, He surrendered His body to death in the place of all, and offered it to the Father. This He did out of sheer love for us, so that in His death all might die…. This He did that He might turn again to incorruption men who had turned back to corruption, and make them alive through death by the appropriation of His body and by the grace of His resurrection…

What then was God to do? What else could He possibly do, being God, but renew His Image in mankind, so that through it men might once more come to know Him? And how could this be done, save by the coming of the very Image Himself, our Savior Jesus Christ? … The Word of God came in His own Person, because it was He alone, the Image of the Father, Who could recreate man made after the Image. Thus it happened that two opposite marvels took place at once: the death of all was consummated in the Lord’s body; yet because the Word was in it, death and corruption were in the same act utterly abolished. Death there had to be, and death for all, so that the due of all might be paid. Wherefore the Word … being Himself incapable of death, assumed a mortal body, that He might offer it as his own in the place of all, and suffering for the sake of all through His union with it, “might bring to naught him that had the power over death, that is, the devil, and might deliver them who all their lifetime were enslaved by the fear of death” (Hebrews 2:14-15). By his death salvation has come to all men, and all creation has been redeemed.

Both Athanasius and Irenaeus emphasized the vicarious nature of the humanity Jesus assumed in his Incarnation. Only through the birth, life, sacrificial death and resurrection of the Incarnate Son of God could God save humanity. This is the essence of the gospel understood by the early church and revealed in the Scriptures.

Gregory of Nazianzus (died A.D. 389) wrote of Jesus’ assumption of our broken humanity through his Incarnation:

If anyone has put his trust in Him [Jesus] as a Man without a human mind, such a person is bereft of mind … for that which He has not assumed He has not healed; but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved. If only half Adam fell, then that which Christ assumes and saves may be half also; but if the whole of his nature fell, it must be united to the whole nature of Him that was begotten, and so be saved as a whole… (Epistle 101).

Contemporary Trinitarian theologians
In the 20th century, Trinitarian theology was advanced in the West largely through the work of Karl Barth and his students, including three brothers: Thomas F. Torrance, James B. Torrance and David Torrance, and their students.

In the 21st century, there are hundreds of Trinitarian theologians scattered among many denominations, including Ray Anderson, Elmer Colyer, Michael Jinkins, C. Baxter Kruger, Alan Torrance, Trevor Hart and the late Colin Gunton.

Who are you, Lord?
Trinitarian theology faithfully answers the all-important question: “Who is Jesus Christ?” This biblically anchored theology adds fullness of understanding to the gospel—and gives us a Christ-centered vocabulary to share the gospel with others in our contemporary world.

“Who are you, Lord?” is the principal theological question. This was Paul’s anguished question on the Damascus Road, where he was struck down by the resurrected Jesus (Acts 9:5). Paul spent the rest of his life answering this question and then sharing the answer with all who would listen. The answer, revealed to us in Scripture, is the heart of the gospel and the focus of Trinitarian theology:

Jesus is fully God—the Second Person of the Trinity, the divine Son of God, in eternal union with the Father and the Spirit. Scripture tells us that through the Son of God the entire universe was created, including all humans (Col. 1:16), and he is the one who sustains the universe, including all humans (verse 17). So, when we say “Jesus Christ” we are also saying “God” and “Creator.”

Jesus is fully human—the Son of God (the Word) became human (“flesh,” John 1:14), while continuing to remain fully divine. This is called the “Incarnation.” Scripture testifies that the Incarnation never ended, but continues—Jesus is now and forever fully God and fully human. He was resurrected and ascended bodily. He will return bodily, the same as he departed. When we say “Jesus Christ” we are also saying “humanity.”

As the One who is uniquely God (Creator and Sustainer of all) and also fully human, Jesus, in Himself, is the unique union of God and humanity. In and through the life, death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus all humans are included in the life and love of God. As the apostle Paul emphasized, the man Jesus (1 Timothy 2:5) is the representative and substitute for all people – past, present, and future. He is the vicarious human who has come to live and die and be raised in our place and on our behalf to reconcile us to God – Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

In Romans 5, Paul addresses believers, but what he says applies to all humanity—believers and non-believers alike. According to Paul, through Jesus, all are…
  • justified through faith, and therefore at peace with God (v. 1)
  • reconciled to God through the death of Jesus (v. 10)
  • saved through Jesus’ life (v. 10)

This justification, reconciliation and salvation occurred:
  • when we were “still powerless” (v. 6)
  • when we were “still sinners” (v. 8)
  • when we were still “God’s enemies” (v. 10)

This occurred quite apart from our participation, let alone our good works. Jesus did these things for us and to us, and he did it within himself. As Irenaeus said, echoing Ephesians 1:10, it occurred in Jesus, via his Incarnation, through a great “recapitulation.”

The benefit of what Jesus did so long ago, extends to the present and on into the future, for Paul says, “how much more…shall we be saved through his life” (v. 10)—showing that salvation is not a one-time transaction, but an enduring relationship that God has with all humanity—a relationship forged within the person of Jesus Christ—the one who, in himself, has brought God and humanity together in peace.

Jesus, the second Adam
Continuing in Romans 5, Paul compares the first Adam to Jesus, calling the latter the “second” or “final” Adam. Note Paul’s main points:
  • “Just as sin entered the world through one man [Adam]…[and] all sinned…” (v. 12)
  • “How much more did God’s grace and the gift that came by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ [the second Adam], overflow to the many?” (v. 15)
  • And, “just as the result of one trespass [that of the first Adam] was condemnation for all men, so also the result of one act of righteousness [that of Jesus, the second or final Adam] was justification that brings life for all men” (v. 18).

“All” really means “all”
Paul is speaking of what Jesus did for all humanity. The scope of his vicarious human life extends to all who have ever lived. But not all Christians see “all” in this way:

Calvinism, for example, says salvation is not truly for all because the atonement is limited to the elect who are predestined to be saved; Jesus did not die for the non-elect. However, the Bible declares that Jesus died for all—and that his death applies to all now. Relevant passages include:
  • John 12:32: “But I [Jesus], when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to myself.”
  • 2 Corinthians 5:14: “Christ’s love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died.”
  • Colossians 1:19-20: “For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.
  • 1 Timothy 2:3-6: “This is good, and pleases God our Savior, who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all men.”
  • 1 Timothy 4:9-10: “This is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance…that we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all men, and especially of those who believe.”
  • Hebrews 2:9: “But we see Jesus, who…suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.”
  • 1 John 2:2: “[Jesus is] the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
  • See also John 1:29; 3:17; Romans 8:32; 2 Corinthians 5:18-19; Titus 2:11; and 1 John 4:14.

While there is even more evidence, this scriptural evidence is sufficient to conclude that Jesus died for all humanity.

Salvation is re-creation, not mere transaction
Arminianism, in contrast to Calvinism, agrees that “all” refers to the entirety of humanity; however, salvation is only potentially theirs, not actually since salvation is not actually given until a person has faith.

But the Bible tells us that salvation does not come about through a mere transaction in which God gives us salvation in exchange for our repentance and faith.

Rather than a transaction, Scripture presents salvation as a free and unearned gift, a gift that involves re-creation. In Jesus, who is fully God and fully human, the perfect representative and substitute for humanity, all humans are a new creation. Although it is experienced only through faith, all humans are justified, reconciled and saved precisely because they are all included in Jesus—included in his Incarnation, life, death, resurrection and ascension.

Jesus did all this for us and to us by doing it with us and in us—as one of us. Jesus is the One for the many, the many in the One. Therefore, we understand from Scripture that…
  • When Jesus died, all humanity died with him.
  • When Jesus rose, all humanity rose to new life with him.
  • When Jesus ascended, all humanity ascended and became seated with him at the Father’s side.

Let’s review the relevant passages:
  • 2 Corinthians 5:14-16: “For Christ’s love compels us, because we are convinced that one died for all, and therefore all died. And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again.”

As we saw earlier in Romans 5:18, the result of Jesus’ righteousness is “justification that brings life for all men.” We are told to accept Christ’s sacrifice, but this does not cause the sacrifice to be effective; it was already effective.
  • Colossians 1:15-17: “He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.”

Because Jesus is both Creator and Sustainer of the entire cosmos (all humanity included), when he died, all creation (all humans included) “went down” with him—”therefore all died” (2 Corinthians 5:14). And when he rose, we all rose; and when he ascended, we all ascended. Jesus includes everyone (“all”) in his Incarnation, life, death, burial, resurrection and ascension.
  • Romans 6:10: “The death he [Jesus] died, he died to sin once for all.” Jesus’ death is already effective for everyone; he died to sin once for all.
  • Ephesians 2:4-5: “But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions—it is by grace you have been saved.”
  • 1 Peter 1:18-20: “For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you…but with the precious blood of Christ…. He [Jesus] was chosen [to save humanity] before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake.”

The gospel is about a relationship, a relationship with God healed and made real by God’s own action in Christ on our behalf. It is not about a set of demands, nor is it about a simple intellectual acceptance of a set of religious or Bible facts. Jesus Christ not only stood in for us at the judgment seat of God; he drew us into himself and made us, with him and in him, by the Spirit, God’s own beloved children.

The one in whom all the cosmos (including all humanity) lives and moves and has its being (Acts 17:28) became fully human while remaining fully divine (John 1:14).

Many theologies present a truncated view of the Incarnation—seeing it as a short-term accommodation by Jesus to pay the penalty for human sin. But Scripture presents the Incarnation as ongoing.

The miracle of the Incarnation is not something that happened “once upon a time,” now past. It is a change in how the entire cosmos is “wired”—it is a new creation (2 Corinthians 5:17). The Incarnation changed everything, forever—reaching back to all human history, and reaching forward to encompass all time as it unfolds.

Paul speaks of this in Romans 7:4, where he says that even while we are alive, we are already dead to the law by the body of Christ. Jesus’ death in human flesh for us, though a historic event, is a present reality that applies to all humanity (past, present and future). It is this cosmic fact that underlies all history. This understanding is reinforced in Colossians 3:3: “You died,” Paul says to the historically alive Colossians, “and your life is hid with Christ in God.” Even before we literally die, therefore, we are already dead in Jesus’ death and alive in Jesus’ resurrection.
This is perhaps most clearly stated in Ephesians 2:5-6, where Paul asserts that since we are dead already in the mystery of Jesus’ substitutionary death, all of us have also (right now), been “made alive together with him” and we are “raised up together with him” and “seated together with him in the heavenly realms.” In other words, God in Christ not only intersects history at one moment of time, but also is the eternal contemporary of every moment in time, present there with all humanity included in him.

Perichoresis
The eternal communion of love that Father, Son and Spirit share as the Trinity involves a mystery of inter-relationship and interpenetration of the divine Persons, a mutual indwelling without loss of personal identity. As Jesus said, “…the Father is in me, and I in the Father” (John 10:38). Early Greek-speaking Christian theologians described this relationship with the word perichoresis, which is derived from root words meaning around and contain.

Theologian Michael Jinkins comments on how this perichoretic life involves God’s relationship with humanity:

The idea communicated by the word perichoresis is crucial but difficult to handle. We can best deal with it by focusing our attention on the incarnation. When the Word became flesh, God poured out his very life into creation while also and simultaneously taking into his own triune being our humanity in the supreme act of self-abnegation for the sake of others. In this free act of self-surrender, God allows us to look into the very heart of his eternal being, into the Father’s eternal outpouring into the Son, God’s giving away of his own self without reservation. This act of self-giving is itself not merely some “it” but is God the Holy Spirit, flowing eternally from the Father to the Son and through the Son to humanity. As the Son in joyful surrender returns this love to the Father, the Spirit eternally returns to the Father, the Origin of all being (Invitation to Theology, p. 91).

Everyone is in Christ
In and through Jesus Christ, God reaches out to include humans in his life and love. In and through Jesus, all humanity is now included in the eternal fellowship of the Trinity, although that fellowship can be experienced only through faith.

Jesus said to his followers the night before he died on the cross: “On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you” (John 14:20).

He does not say that one day they will be included—he says they are included and one day they will realize it. Salvation is about being “in” Jesus, not merely something being done “by” Jesus, which we later accept and thus make it “real” or “actual” for us. Salvation is about a relationship, and that is why Paul so frequently in his letters (over 130 times) speaks of something being “in Christ” or similar phrases.

Salvation is ours only in union with Jesus, by which we share in Jesus’ perfect human life and his relationship to the Father and the Spirit. United to Jesus, we are already included in God’s triune life and love. But we cannot experience the joy of that life apart from faith.
As we have seen in Scripture, through union with Jesus, all humanity is…
  • reconciled to the Father.
  • liked, loved and wanted by the Father.
  • accepted “in the Beloved” (Ephesians 1:6, KJV).
  • forgiven (no record of sin and no condemnation).

The gospel declares not the possibility or the potential of these things being true for us, but a reality that we are urged to accept.

The faith of Christ
In the King James Version, Galatians 2:20 reads: “I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.”

This and other translations speak appropriately of our sharing in the faith of Christ (rather than “faith in Christ”). It is Christ’s faith that saves us. David Torrance writes (emphasis added):

We are saved by Christ’s faith and obedience to the Father, not ours. My brother Tom [Torrance] often quoted Gal. 2:20…. Such is the wording of the KJV, which I believe is a correct translation…. Other translators, like those of the New International Version, apparently because they found it so difficult to believe we can live by Christ’s faith rather than our faith, have altered the text to make it read, “I live by faith in the Son of God” – something altogether different! That translation takes away from the vicarious nature of Christ’s life of faith. It is by his faith [not ours] that we are saved and live! Our faith is a thankful response to his faith. When we look back along our lives and ponder how disobedient we at times have been and continue to be, it is marvelously comforting to know that Christ gives us his life of obedience to the Father and that it is Christ’s obedience which counts. We are saved by his obedience, not ours. (An Introduction to Torrance Theology, pp. 7-8)

Thomas Torrance writes:
Jesus steps into the actual situation where we are summoned to have faith in God, to believe and trust in him, and he acts in our place and in our stead from within the depths of our unfaithfulness and provides us freely with a faithfulness in which we may share…. That is to say, if we think of belief, trust or faith as forms of human activity before God, then we must think of Jesus Christ as believing, trusting, or having faith in God the Father on our behalf and in our place. ... Through his incarnational and atoning union with us our faith is implicated in his faith, and through that implication, far from being depersonalized or dehumanized, it is made to issue freely and spontaneously out of our own human life before God. Regarded merely in itself, however as Calvin used to say, faith is an empty vessel, for in faith it is upon the faithfulness of Christ that we rest and even the way in which we rest on his is sustained and undergirded by his unfailing faithfulness (The Mediation of Christ, pp. 82-83).

But what about human freedom?
If it is the life, faith and obedience of Jesus Christ that saves us and includes us in that salvation, what is our role? What happens in this viewpoint to the idea of human freedom? Consider the following points:
  • All humanity, by God’s sovereign decision and action, is included in Christ; this inclusion was predestined and has been accomplished in Jesus, apart from any action, belief, works, etc. of our own.
  • Each person is now urged, through the prompting of the Spirit, to believe God’s word and personally accept his love.
  • God forces this personal decision/acceptance upon no one. Love must be freely given and freely received; it cannot be coerced, or it is not love.
  • Thus human decision, the exercise of human freedom, is of great importance, but only in this context of accepting God’s gift that has already been freely given.

Not universalism
When we talk about human decision, we are talking about personal response. And we must take care not to confuse what is objectively true in Jesus for all humanity with an individual’s personal and subjective reception of or encounter with this objective truth.
  • We do not “decide for Christ” in the sense that our personal decision creates or causes our salvation.
  • Rather, through personal decision, we accept what is ours already in Christ, placing our trust in the one who has already trusted for us in our place and as our representative.
  • The Holy Spirit leads us to trust not in our faith, but in Jesus.
  • This objective union, which we have with Christ through his incarnational assumption of our humanity into himself, is personally and subjectively lived out in faith through the indwelling Holy Spirit.
  • When we personally believe the gospel, which is to accept what is already ours by grace, we begin to enjoy God’s love for us and live out the new creation that God, prior to our ever believing, made us to be in Christ.
  •  
There is the general, or objective, truth about all humanity in Jesus, and also the personal, or subjective, experience of this truth.

Objectively all people, past, present and future, are justified already; all are sanctified; all are reconciled in Jesus in and through what he has done as their representative and substitute. In Jesus, objectively, the old self has already passed away; in him, objectively, we are already the new humanity, represented as such by him before and with God.

However, although all people are already objectively redeemed by Jesus Christ, not all have yet personally and subjectively awakened to and accepted what God has done for them. They do not yet know who they truly are in union with Jesus.

What is objectively true for everyone must be subjectively and personally received and experienced through repentance and faith. Repentance and faith do not create or cause a person’s salvation, but salvation cannot be experienced and enjoyed without them. Repentance and faith are themselves gifts of God.

In the Scriptures, we find some verses that speak to the general/objective, while others speak to the personal/subjective. Both are real and true—but the personal is true only because the general is a pre-existing reality.

These two categories are found throughout Scripture—both sometimes occurring in one passage, as happens in 2 Corinthians 5:18-21. Paul starts in verses 18-19 with the objective/universal: “All this is from God, who reconciled [past tense] us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men’s sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation.”

Good news for all people
Here is a general truth that applies objectively to all—all are already reconciled to God through what Jesus has done in union with all humanity.

Any theology that is faithful to Scripture and to Jesus himself must account for this truth. Unfortunately, many theologies tend to ignore this aspect and focus primarily or only on the personal/subjective. That does the gospel a disservice, because it is the general/objective aspect of who Jesus is and what he has done that is the foundation upon which the personal/subjective rests.

Back to 2 Corinthians 5, having established the general in verses 18-21, Paul goes on in verses 20-21 to address the subjective/ personal: “We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. God made him who had no sin to be sin for us.”

How can all be “reconciled” already and yet the invitation go out to “be reconciled”—suggesting a reconciliation yet to occur? The answer is that both are true—these are two aspects of one truth. All are already reconciled in Christ—this is the universal and objective truth—but not all yet embrace and therefore experience their reconciliation with God.

To be reconciled, and yet not know and experience it, is to continue to live as though one is not reconciled. Having one’s eyes opened by the Spirit to this reconciliation, choosing to embrace it, and then experiencing it does not cause the reconciliation to occur, but it does make it personally realized. Thus, the evangelistic invitation from Christ’s ambassadors (verse 20) is to “be reconciled.” But this appeal is not to do something that would bring about reconciliation; rather it is an appeal to receive the reconciliation that exists already with God in Christ.

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Running: Boston Strong

This week I ran the Boston Marathon...the small town in Michigan where I grew up asked me to write a little story line about my experience. What follows is the thoughts in writing that I submitted:

Running….from Marcellus to Boston
The journey, which recently took me to Boston to run the 117th Boston Marathon, all started in Marcellus, MI. Our family moved from Illinois to Marcellus in the late 1950s where we would live for the entirety of my school years, culminating in graduation from high school in 1972. These were good years for me growing up in Marcellus…good friends, and good times…and it was in Marcellus that I discovered my love for, and my ability to run. I, like many others kids, participated in school sports like football and basketball, but really never excelled in these arenas. However, when I discovered that I could run distance races with some success, I put my whole heart into it. During track season it was not uncommon for me to go out for early morning runs along the roads before getting ready for school. And remember, this was in the days before it was common place to see “joggers” out doing their thing. Recently, I have regained contact with one of my high school track coaches, Mr. Teremi, and we have enjoyed chatting with each other via email. I think, for a time, I held both the 2 mile run and 1 mile run Marcellus High School records, although there is no doubt that these have been surpassed significantly by now. For my junior and senior years of high school, I qualified to run at the State meet.

The years that followed high school graduation were followed by a lot of travel, including volunteer work in Europe as well as in India, Bangladesh and Nepal. I didn’t go to college immediately, however, I never left running completely always coming back to it in one form or the other. My first full marathon was the Detroit Free Press Marathon in October of 1980. I had never run this distance before, and wasn’t sure what to expect. However, we started the race in Windsor, Ontario and ran under the Detroit River through the tunnel and ran through the streets of Detroit finishing up on Belle Isle. I think I ran a 3:08 that time. The following year, I ran the Free Press Marathon again, not knowing that it would not be for another 28 years or so until I would do it again. I still participated in running and training, but mostly for races like 10K events or even 10 mile competitions like the Bobby Crimm run up in Flint, MI.

In 1995 I finished my Master’s work at Wayne State University to become a nurse practitioner, and then moved from the Detroit area down to Las Cruces, New Mexico where I live now. Living in the Desert South-West gave me very agreeable weather conditions to continue running, and so a few years ago, I registered to run the Arizona Rock ‘n’ Roll marathon in Phoenix on January 18, 2009. I certainly wasn’t as fast as I was back in 1981, but I realized that I could still do the long distance. That is when the thought of running Boston was conceived in my mind.
The Boston Marathon is the “grand-daddy” of all marathons with such a rich history and heritage. Unlike other marathons, you cannot just sign up and pay the registration fee to run Boston…it is the only marathon where one has to run a qualifying time in another marathon to be accepted as an entrant. So, in December of 2011, I ran a 3:30 Tucson Marathon in Tucson, AZ. I was on my way to Boston!
I registered and was accepted for the 117th running of the Boston Marathon and began making preparations for the trip. Hotel and flight reservations were made, and I began the weeks of training involved in getting my body ready for the run. I arrived in Boston a few days before the marathon and was happy to see that the city was gearing up for its annual Patriot’s Day event. The marathon is always run on the third Monday of April, which in Massachusetts is Patriot’s Day…the state’s biggest holiday.
On race day morning, April 15, thousands of us showed up at the Boston Commons to catch buses out to the small town of Hopkinton…about 26 miles west of the center of Boston. Arriving at the start, about 27,000 of us hung out in the athletes’ village awaiting the start. Since the field of runners is so large, the race starts in 3 separate waves based on qualifying times…I was in the second wave so my start time was 10:20 am.
As the gun went off, we all started moving slowly toward the starting line…each of was wearing a computer chip that was under our bib number…our official time wouldn’t actually start until we crossed the starting line. As we ran along the course through different hamlets and towns, the people of the Boston area lined the course by the thousands, offering support by way of cheers, orange slices and other helpful items…the support from the crowds was amazing! The last six miles or so were pretty hard, and there is a famous hill called Heartbreak Hill that takes quite a bit out of your legs…at this point sheer determination seems to be the only operative commodity. Finally, seeing the finish line in the distance, my spirits lifted and I made it across in 3:37!
After finishing a major marathon like this, there is a process that takes place right after the run. Immediately, you are given hydration, and then very soon a “space blanket” is wrapped around you to prevent hypothermia, especially if it is a bit cool…which it was! All crowded together, hundreds of us are in a barricaded street marching on to the next station which is receiving our medals!!! Finally!!! Then, we make our way to the buses that have brought our clothing bags from the starting line. There is also food like bananas, power bars and snacks being given to us as we march along.
After this process, since I had no family with me, I decided to catch the subway train back to my hotel. Going down into the noisy and crowded underground station, we were packed onto the “green line” train. Just as it was ready to pull out of the station, everybody was told to get off and evacuate the station…we weren’t sure why. When I emerged from the station, I didn’t realize the magnitude of what had happened since this subway station was about 2 blocks from the finish line.
So without realizing what had happened while I was down in the subway station, I started walking to another station to see if I could catch a blue line train…I should tell you that “walking” is not really accurate…it would be more like “hobbling”! After running 26 miles…especially at my age of 59, the bones, muscles and joints don’t want to move…so, ambulation is very painful!
Anyway, after going for about 3 miles or so, I finally found a station that was still servicing outbound trains to where I needed to go…and after about 2 ½ hours I finally made it back to the hotel. Since I didn’t have my phone with me, I spent the next hour or so getting in touch with my family and friends to let them know that I was alright…many had been worried when they couldn’t reach me. By that time, I was watching the events unfold on the television, and fully understood the magnitude of the tragic events that I had just missed. And so, after another unrelated airline delay the next day, I finally made it home on Wednesday to be with my family.
Yes, I will keep running, as I know that thousands of others will be doing…and maybe, I will go back to Boston in 2014 to run the Boston Marathon to honor those who were hurt and killed in this senseless act of cowardice. Please, join with me in your prayers for the many athletes, volunteers, and spectators who have been adversely affected by this tragedy. Thanks!













Tuesday, April 9, 2013

The Logic of Jesus


One of the most common ways that Jesus would teach people while he walked this planet was to encourage them to use their capacity to think. He didn’t usually tell them “Believe this because I say it is true!” That, in fact, was much the way the scribes and “God experts” of the day would teach people…sadly, many God experts in the 21st century use the same authoritarian mode over people. Sometimes, people are even discouraged from thinking rationally and logically about God with the authority saying “God’s ways are not our ways…his thoughts are not our thoughts, and we can’t understand, we just have to believe” with the implicit understanding being the God expert’s own spin on some particular scripture or spiritual matter.

But Jesus is different…in fact, people noticed this difference right away when they remarked: “He teaches differently…like he knows what he is talking about…not like our regular spiritual teachers”.

One simple teaching that comes from the Sermon on the Mount illustrates this well. Jesus is trying to convey something of the goodness and loving nature of God, so he says: “You parents---if your children ask for a loaf of bread, do you give them a stone instead? Or if they ask for a fish, do you give them a snake? Of course not! So if you sinful people know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly father give good gifts to those who ask him.”  See what Jesus is doing. He is asking us to look at something that is a known fact…the inherent parental nature to do good for our children, despite our own flaws, and then transfer that goodness to him whose image we have been created in, and who has no flaws. The logical conclusion is “Yes!! God is a very good father who will only do good for us, his children”. So we don’t need to live our lives in anxiety and worry. Jesus encourages us to think through these issues about God.

Now, let us use some liberty and expand on this parable a bit. Suppose that a recently married man and woman have started talking about having children. They both came from loving families, but the woman knew also that there were some genetic abnormalities in her family that had cause some birth defects in the past. So, they decide to get some genetic testing done before pursuing children of their own. Finally when the tests come back the geneticist tells them that if they conceive and give birth to a child there is more than an 80% chance that it will be deformed. Not only would this child have a horrendous physical and mental deformity that would cause it great mental and emotional suffering, but it would also be born with a physical condition that would cause the child to be in continual, excruciating pain 24 hours a day, and would be unable to be relieved with any type of pain relievers.

Now, armed with this knowledge, wouldn’t it be safe to say that even though this couple really wants children of their own, they would not be “good” people is they chose to ignore the facts and go ahead and conceive a child anyway? Wouldn’t the good and right thing be to remain childless, or maybe to choose the route of adoption?

And so it must be with God.  If he knew that somewhere around 80% of humanity would reject him (as evangelicals are fond of saying), and that because of this rejection, he would cast them into an eternal torture chamber, continually burning with napalm all over them for eternity (again as evangelicals are fond of saying), would he be considered a good and loving God? Could the apostle John describe him in the simple words: “God is Love”?

I don’t think so…Jesus teaches us that God is good and that he cares for the most minute details of our lives. We can rest in what God has done to take care of any hindrances that may keep us from experiencing his love for eternity.

Friday, January 4, 2013

A Gift?


Recently a friend posted this on her Facebook. I am sure that it was meant to garner praise for such wonderful parenting skills and discipline (you may agree)…however, my immediate thought was that this is exactly what the God Experts and the Institutional Church  have done with God’s free gift of life through Jesus. On the one hand, they call it a “free gift”, but when you look at the fine print it is clouded…depending on which particular flavor of church you adhere to….by conditional restrictions. "Yes you can have the free gift of salvation, BUT….you must come to church regularly, give money to support the church, clean up your bad habits, dress appropriately, listen to the right kind of music, etc., etc., etc."

Whereas Jesus teaches that the gift of life through him has been ALREADY freely given! We just need to start living in the reality of that truth. NO STRINGS ATTACHED!! NO CONDITIONAL CLAUSES IN THE FINE PRINT!

Here is the article…what do you think?


Hoffman is a kid who just got an iPhone from his parents. His mom, Janell Hoffman, wrote these [slightly edited] rules for its use:

1. It is my phone. I bought it. I pay for it. I am loaning it to you. Aren't I the greatest?
2. I will always know the password.
3. If it rings, answer it. It is a phone. Say hello, use your manners. Do not ever ignore a phone call if the screen reads "Mom" or "Dad". Not ever.
4. Hand the phone to one of your parents promptly at 7:30pm every school night & every weekend night at 9:00pm. It will be shut off for the night and turned on again at 7:30am. If you would not make a call to someone's land line, wherein their parents may answer first, then do not call or text. Listen to those instincts and respect other families like we would like to be respected.
5. It does not go to school with you. Have a conversation with the people you text in person. It's a life skill.
6. If it falls into the toilet, smashes on the ground, or vanishes into thin air, you are responsible for the replacement costs or repairs.
7. Do not use this technology to lie, fool, or deceive another human being. Do not involve yourself in conversations that are hurtful to others. Be a good friend first or stay the hell out of the crossfire.
8-9. Do not text, email, or say anything through this device you would not say in person.
10. No porn.
11. Turn it off, silence it, put it away in public. Especially in a restaurant, at the movies, or while speaking with another human being. You are not a rude person; do not allow the iPhone to change that.
12. Do not send or receive pictures of your private parts or anyone else's private parts. Don't laugh. Someday you will be tempted to do this despite your high intelligence. It is risky and could ruin your teenage/college/adult life. It is always a bad idea. Cyberspace is vast and more powerful than you. And it is hard to make anything of this magnitude disappear -- including a bad reputation.
13. Don't take a zillion pictures and videos. There is no need to document everything. Live your experiences. They will be stored in your memory for eternity.
14. Leave your phone home sometimes and feel safe and secure in that decision. It is not alive or an extension of you. Learn to live without it. Be bigger and more powerful than FOMO -- fear of missing out.
15. Download music that is new or classic or different than the millions of your peers that listen to the same exact stuff. Your generation has access to music like never before in history. Take advantage of that gift. Expand your horizons.
16. Play a game with words or puzzles or brain teasers every now and then.
17. Keep your eyes up. See the world happening around you. Stare out a window. Listen to the birds. Take a walk. Talk to a stranger. Wonder without googling.
18. You will mess up. I will take away your phone. We will sit down and talk about it. We will start over again. You & I, we are always learning. I am on your team. We are in this together.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Book Review: "Cross Roads" by Wm. Paul Young

Well, Wm. Paul Young has done it again!! As you know, his first novel, "The Shack" stirred millions of readers to the core of their beings, shedding insightful light on the character of God and his relentless love of us. Of course, many were stirred in a different way...to anger and disgust...because the paradigm of this relationship with God that was offered up by Young didn't fit with their own cherished personal orthodoxy about God. Anyway, if you read "The Shack", and it moved you in either of these two ways, I suspect that Young's most recent book "Cross Roads" will do much the same if, and when you read it.

Young has such insights into the mysteries of life and our relationship with God that it is difficult not to let these truths soak into our souls. It is not so much that he "solves" the mysteries, but rather presents them is such a way that living in the land of mystery and paradox is something to be more desired than cut and dried theological answers and keeping "God in a box" sort of thinking.

I personally liked this book better than "The Shack"...but again, that is a personal opinion. As I read others' reviews I see that some preferred "Cross Roads", and others liked the first book, "The Shack" better. My take on this is that each book meets each of us where we are at, and touches us at a very personal level. "Cross Roads" stirred me deeply because it exposed and explained to me many of the dysfunctional survival mechanisms that I have developed over the years that have resulted in people close to me being hurt. And yet, this is done in a grace filled way that brings hope instead of condemnation. Let me paste here the published book description so that you can get a sense of what the story is all about.

"Anthony Spencer is egotistical, proud of being a self-made business success at the peak of his game, even though the cost of winning was painfully high. A cerebral hemorrhage leaves Tony comatose in a hospital ICU. He 'awakens' to find himself in a surreal world, a 'living' landscape that mirrors dimensions of his earthly life, from the beautiful to the corrupt. It is here that he has vivid interactions with others he assumes are projections of his own subconscious, but whose directions he follows nonetheless with the possibility that they might lead to authenticity and perhaps, redemption. The adventure draws Tony into deep relational entanglements where he is able to 'see' through the literal eyes and experiences of others, but is "blind" to the consequences of hiding his personal agenda and loss that emerge to war against the processes of healing and trust. Will this unexpected coalescing of events cause Tony to examine his life and realize he built a house of cards on the poisoned grounds of a broken heart? Will he also have the courage to make a critical choice that can undo a major injustice he set in motion before falling into a coma?"

I highly recommend this book and give it 5 stars....I have already bought 5 more copies and suspect I will be buying more to give away to friends!

Monday, December 3, 2012

A Kingdom Principle: Non-Interference

Jesus told a story about the kingdom of God. He said: “God’s kingdom is like a farmer who one day planted good seed in his field. But later that night while everyone one was getting a good night’s rest, his enemy came and spread seeds of weeds all over the ground and then slipped away before anyone woke up…nobody knew that this had happened. Even when green shoots began to appear in the ground it wasn’t apparent that there were good plants and bad plants. Finally when the good seed began to form heads of grain the bad plants were observed to be weeds. The workers went to the farmer and said ‘Wasn’t that quality seed that you planted? So where did all of these weeds come from?’ The farmer said ‘An enemy has done this’. So the farm workers asked him if they should go pull out the weeds to clean up the field. The farmer said ‘No, let them grow together…if you pull out the weeds, you will uproot a lot of the good grain plants as well. I will take care of the matter at harvest time’. “

Now, this story…or parable…certainly has a lot of meaning about the kingdom of God, and even some eschatological implications. But that is not what strikes me today. What I see here is our (farm workers) obsession with wanting to “fix” things and make things right….right away! Certain things, of course, do need some immediate attention. If in the dead of winter, the furnace in your home in Montana goes belly up…you will want to fix it as soon as possible! But issues of the kingdom usually revolve around relationships, personalities and lifestyles. Our tendency…as members of God’s kingdom is to see things that appear to be “wrong”  in others…(and maybe even in ourselves)….and immediately we set out to “fix” the problem. Jesus seems to be saying here that there is a kingdom principle of “non-interference” that we should follow for the purpose of allowing God to work things out in his way and in his time.

After all…the kingdom of God is like yeast that is hidden in a lump of dough that invisibly does its job…but that is another parable!